limousin_image_11

Carcase Merit Index

The ‘Carcase Merit Index’ service is offered by ‘Natural Ecosystems Group’ (NEG), Albury, NSW, Australia

The use of live animal carcase scanning is not a new service, but not until the introduction of the ‘Carcase Merit Index’ system, which utilises the liveweight and scanning information and ranks an animal against other peers, did this information get put to best use.

The ‘Carcase Merit Index’ (CMI) is calculated for each animal, and is based upon the Live Weight(LW), Eye Muscle Area(EMA), Fat Depths(FD) and Intramuscular Fat(IMF) of the animals scanned.

Animals with heavy LW, large EMA, least FD and high IMF are rated highest by the ‘CMI’.

The results are presented in groupings by sex and age, and ranked from highest to lowest.

N.B. It is recommended that animals under the age of 24 months be divided into groups with up to a three month spread of age for the purpose of peer group comparisons.

In regard to ‘Carcase Merit Index’ standards, such standards are continually being updated from incoming data. At this stage, the following standards are offered for cattle as a guide,

  1. Eye Muscle Areas(EMAs) greater than 100 cm sq. for either sex and all ages excluding cattle under 6 months, is a very good result.
  2. Fat Depths measured on both the Rib and P8;Rump of >3mm and <10mm are ideal results for Domestic Trade cattle.
  3. Carcase Merit Index
Bulls/Steers Mature: (48 months) > 3500
2700-3500
2000-2699
< 2000
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Mature: (36 months) > 3180
2430-3180
1800-2429
< 1800
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Two Year Old: (24 months) > 2660
1950-2660
1350-1949
< 1350
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Yearling: (18 months) > 2300
1600-2300
1000-1599
< 1000
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
12 months > 1525
1050-1525
680-1049
< 680
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
6 months > 750
500-750
340-499
< 340
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Cows/Heifers Mature: (48 months) > 1750
1350-1750
1000-1349
< 1000
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Mature: (36 months) > 1580
1220-1580
890-1219
< 890
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Two Year Old: (24 months) > 1150
1040-1150
725-1039
< 725
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
Yearling: (18 months) > 1150
900-1150
600-899
< 600
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
12 months > 775
600-775
400-599
< 400
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard
6 months > 400
300-400
200-299
< 200
– Super Elite
– Elite
– Standard
– Sub Standard

The following comments are offered to assist you to interpret how livestock have rated on the Carcase Merit Index system:

Mature Bulls with a CMI result > 3100 is a very good result.
Two Year Bulls(24 months) with a CMI result > 2300 is a very good result.
Yearling Bulls(18 months) with a CMI result > 1950 is a very good result.
Young Bulls(12 months) with a CMI result > 1250 is a very good result.
Young Bulls(6 months) with a CMI result > 625 is a very good result.

Mature Cows with a CMI result > 1550 is a very good result.
Two Year Cows(24 months) with a CMI result > 1100 is a very good result.
Yearling Heifers(18 months) with a CMI result > 1025 is a very good result.
Young Heifers(12 months) with a CMI result > 690 is a very good result.
Young Heifers(6 months) with a CMI result > 350 is a very good result.

Mr Leon Martin has found great success in using the ‘Carcase Merit Index’ and scanning results as a marketing tool with bull/cattle buying clients. The ‘CMI’ together with scanning data, which is real data and not estimates, are very easily comprehended by buyers. Consequently, the CMI system is becoming increasingly popular with breeders as a marketing language/tool.

Working toward a better future for the Australian Livestock Producer and Meat Industry by measuring, and making a difference.

No more Guess Work!!

Maternal Index

At Weaning, all calves and their dams are weighed at the time.

Then, the data is divided into two groups for assessment and comparison – male calves and female calves.

Then, within the male and female groups, the liveweight of each calf is accounted against the age of the calf and then the subsequent performance of the calf accounted against the liveweight of each dam.

This assessment reflects on the dams ability to produce red meat, relative to her own body weight/size. It also, provide a very valuable insight into the merit of the different dam body sizes, and resultant efficiency of use of on farm resources.

Dams recording the highest ‘Maternal Index’ within each sex group are the best producing.